"Dirty War" Ramps Up In Britain
There’s no way to understate the extent to which the British state, in collusion with the media, is inverting reality to set the table.

Before we begin, I want to point out that my new blogging strategy - publishing shorter pieces more frequently - has so far met a positive response. As such, I have no reason to revert back to the mean at the moment, even as it’s likely I’ll eventually end up doing so. Some of you expressed a preference for longer essays. But again, it never hurts to try something new. I appreciate everyone offering their feedback.
There are upsides and downsides to either approach. I’ve always been a “quality over quantity, less is more” type of person. However, I do understand some people just don’t have time to read anything that doesn’t fit into an E-mail. My specialty has and always will be long-form, but I also think it worth it to save that for the topics that really deserve it. As for the thought-dumps, it’s probably better to release those more frequently, in shorter form.
With that, let’s get down to business.
Britain’s far-left regime is moving Heaven and Earth to exploit the success of Netflix’s Adolescence series to wage what’s increasingly certain to become a form of “dirty war” against the native, White British populace.
Here’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer getting in on the act:
The Regime, like the totalitarians of yore, rests on a foundation of lies. It’s still jarring to see them engage in this level of self-deception, however.
In my last Substack, I mentioned in passing that Andrew Tate, someone associated with the “manosphere” and cited as a key cog in the purported radicalization problem among young White males, is actually more popular, at least in the United Kingdom, among non-White young males.
How much popular? By a lot:
Yet the story of Adolescence is centered on a young White male who’s a fan of Andrew Tate, supposedly (I didn’t and don’t intend to watch the show). Having the perpetrator as a young Black or Asian male would be more accurate, but it’d also run afoul of political correctness.1 You just can’t afford to portray non-Whites in anything but the most glowing of depictions. Whites? They’ve long been the villain of choice in media. In fact, I rarely see Blacks portrayed as criminals or even antagonists any longer. Hispanics are still fair game, but primarily as cartel members. Asians as well, but only in martial arts movies.
Racial depictions in media is a loaded topic, but the point here is that only Whites are depicted in such a way that all a society’s problems are offloaded entirely unto them. Even problems in the Black community are always, ultimately, a burden for Whites to carry. It’s almost like Blacks couldn’t live without Whites.
The lies continue. I’ve pointed this out many times, but the radicalization problem of young men is fiction. At least, it’s nowhere nearly as problematic as they claim, certainly not enough to be raising a civilization-wide moral panic over.
Data consistently shows that the radicalization is a much, much bigger problem with young women:
An argument could be made that even a little bit of radicalization in young men is worse because of biological differences. I’d be more sensitive to that argument if we were dealing with good-faith interlocutors, but we’re not. It’s also a disingenuous argument, because the radicalization of young women has, in fact, had a deleterious impact on society. We’re just not allowed to speak openly about it, because the West’s increasingly radical leftist leadership obviously thinks young people being radicalized leftward is a good thing and the dominance of feminism also makes even reasoned critiques of women off-limits.
Still, they push the narrative. Having control of society’s key institutions like media is still a tremendous advantage and the Regime is exploiting it fully as they feel resistance to their power intensifying. Opinion columnist Martha Gill devoted an op-ed plus an accompanying X thread 11 tweets long talking about what to do about the radicalization of young men, despite all data to the contrary.
Among other things, Gill suggests:
Take away their smartphones. All over a non-existent moral crisis. It’s worth noting: the radicalization of young females, which is absolutely a real problem, began around 2014 throughout the West. It’s also said to be the year smartphone ownership among young women reached critical mass. Why isn’t anyone suggesting we take smart phones away from young women?
Always be skeptical, verify anything people say, regardless of what their political alignment is, but if any of this is accurate, then it only proves just how detached from reality the public narrative is:
I don’t know how reliable AI is as a source of information, either, but I’m sure if young White males stabbing their female classmates was a big problem, the examples wouldn’t be hard to find. Yet apparently, high-powered AI cannot find it:
There’s no way to understate the extent to which the British state, in collusion with the media, is inverting reality to set the table. The really scary part is how easily people buy the lies.
What’s all this driving towards? What’s this perception-shaping campaign aimed at?It’s all part of what Dr. David Betz identified as a likely “dirty war” to take place in the coming years, followed by an actual kinetic civil war. A dirty war is when a state uses its power to target dissidents or any group it identifies as specifically problematic. They’re not being targeted because they actually pose a threat, but because they’re perceived as posing an obstacle to the state’s aims. In Britain and throughout the West, it appears White males, who comprise a majorities of the respective populations, have been identified as that obstacle. Every war needs an enemy, after all.
If you’re not convinced, consider this:
In case you don’t know, the young man on the left is Axel Rudakubana, who murdered three young girls and injured 10 others in a mass stabbing attack last July, triggering the first major instance of right-wing, White political violence in response. The man in the middle is Mohammad Farooq. He was recently sentenced to life imprisonment for a failed 2023 attempt to blow up a hospital in Leeds using a bomb twice as powerful as the device which detonated at the 2013 Boston Marathon. The young boy on the right is a fictional character.
As the meme says, guess who triggered a louder, more urgent response from the British government?
I used to think France was the country we’d see the first shots of the coming civil war for the West fired, but now I’m nearly convinced that country is actually Britain. There’s so much pressure being built up in the system very quickly, and, as I’ve explained time and again, the British regime is doing everything possible to make things even worse. The British economy continues to struggle mightily and many young Britons not only fear armed conflict is coming, but that there’s simply no future, no reason for them to stick around and fight for their country.
There’s a saying that’s been playing in my head for months: we were a modern society one day, and then in few weeks it turned into carnage. It’s from Selco Begovic, survivor of the 1992-’95 Bosnian war and a highly sought-after voice in prepper/survivalist circles. I’ve studied the post-Yugoslavia Balkans conflicts for a while now and Britain just gives off the vibes of a land on the verge of a similar breakdown. Maybe it won’t fracture into independent states like Yugoslavia did, but the atmosphere is very tense.
This isn’t the perception of talking heads; it’s the perception of people on the ground. Pollster James Johnson recently reported for Channel 4 News on what British voters were thinking.
It’s not pretty:
Their outlook for the country was nothing short of apocalyptic. They spoke of hundreds of homeless Britons on the streets, while “floods” of illegal migrants are housed in hotels on the taxpayer. A carer spoke of children hobbled with mental health problems, the long hangover of the Covid pandemic still biting. The stay-at-home mum talked of criminals and junkies living above her, with politicians and local police powerless to stop them.
And:
The government’s handling was “disgraceful”, “disgusting”, “managed decline”. Britain was described as “losing everything that made us great”. Some even spoke of the possibility of violence, a “civil war”, a “revolution”.
Anyway, I’ve already broken my own rule by having this essay run long, so let’s wrap up on two things.
First:
There’s no stopping the Islamization of Britain. None. Not peacefully, that’s for certain. By 2050, I’d expect it to be a de facto Islamic republic.
Finally, some real-life knife violence out of the UK:
Absolute chaos struck a quiet residential street in Elm Park last night as a gang of youths believed to be armed with knives entered a primary school and began to attack other youths.
Screams were heard from local residents as the special event hosted at the primary school became the subject of an attack.
Youths were seen running from the premises in fear as the gang arrived.
I wonder if they’re going to produce a Netflix series based on this incident? And if they do, will they swap them all out with White performers?
Anyway, what do you think? What’s behind the British state pouncing on the success of Adolescence like this? Is it to set the environment up for a dirty war? Do you think the PR campaign is working?
Talk about it in the comments.
Max Remington writes about armed conflict and prepping. Follow him on Twitter at @AgentMax90.
If you liked this post from We're Not At the End, But You Can See It From Here, why not share? If you’re a first-time visitor, please consider subscribing!
“Asian” in the British context refers also to Indians, Pakistanis, etc. It does not mean only East Asians as it does in an American context.
I agree with the slander thesis, but have a couple of additional thoughts:
1) The fact that British MPs have mixed this up with reality shows that they really are out of touch with reality. I think politics is basically a fantasy land at this point.
2) There is basically zero interest, familiarity or sympathy for young white males at leadership levels now. You basically have childless cat ladies and male NPCs with no energy who can’t inspire and likely don’t have sons or familiarity with male society. A couple of generations ago you would have had a lot of male veterans in Parliament, but now you get social worker and NGO types without kids or who just shipped them off to daycare.
3) I see a rising generational conflict in the West and this type of show being part of a war on the young.
Samo Burja had a good quote on Twitter a few days ago about democracy being incompatible with an aging society. Here in Canada we have an election with polls showing greater support for Conservatives the younger you go, despite the fact that young people are more heavily minority. And you have a new PM who is grey-haired radical talking about Canada’s British roots and running nostalgic ads with Mike Meyers. So we have a situation where young people desperately need change while the old just want to squeeze young people to pay their pensions, buy insanely priced houses, go to work, join the military, while getting nothing in return. Something is going to break.
4) Britain is in bad shape materially and is heading to a debt crisis, which may lead to energy and food crises. In fact it seems the entire Western world is heading to a crisis where the elderly want their pensions, investments and house prices inflated, while there’s really nothing to squeeze. I think ethnic conflict could result, but it’s unpredictable and not guaranteed.
I've been thinking about this for a while now, and I'm glad somebody actually came out and said it: Britain's on track for a full-scale civil war. Being an American, I feel for our forefathers across the ocean; I honestly hope they find a way to resolve this crisis peacefully, however reality would argue that simply won't be the case. Perhaps "Adolescence" will become Britain's "Uncle Tom's Cabin" in that it will be the final straw which will break the camel's back and launch Britain into chaos.